🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.